Example report

Sample AI Visibility Report

Last updated 2026-07-07

A real CitationWorks weekly report, rendered with fictional data. This is the exact document the dashboard compiles every week: executive KPIs, priority issues, recommended actions, citation landscape, and answer movement.

Illustrative example. Meridian CRM, its competitors, and every number in this document are fictional and shown for layout only.

CitationWorks · AI Visibility MonitoringWeekly report

Meridian CRM

How ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini answered 41 buyer questions about CRM software this week, and what to do about it.

Prepared for
meridian-crm.example
Reporting period
Jun 22 – Jun 29, 2026
Generated
Jun 29, 2026 · 06:10 UTC
Scope
41 prompts × ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini
01

Executive summary

Meridian is named in about a third of tracked buyer questions, up six points on the prior week. The gap is downstream of citations: competitors' comparison pages get quoted as sources while Meridian's own domain rarely does, and six prompts still carry a trust gap where models describe the product but cite someone else for the facts.

34%

Brand mention rate

of 41 tracked prompts, up 6 pts vs. prior week

18%

Citation share (own domain)

answers with sources that cite meridian-crm.example

6

Trust gap

prompts where the brand is discussed but never cited

+9 pp

Competitor citation gap

competitor domains cited more often than yours

5

Open issues

2 high severity, see section 02

2

Unacknowledged alerts

answer changes waiting for review

5

Open recommendations

top 3 listed in section 03

11

Answer changes

answers that changed vs. last run

2

High-impact changes

ranking or sentiment shifted materially

72

Lighthouse perf. (mobile)

PageSpeed performance score

94

Lighthouse perf. (desktop)

PageSpeed performance score

02

Priority issues

Open issues from this period, ordered by severity. Each links back to the prompt, the model, and the answer that triggered it.

  1. 02.1

    Gemini describes the discontinued Essentials plan as current

    On "how much does Meridian CRM cost", Gemini quotes the Essentials plan at $19 per seat. That plan was retired in March. The likely source is an unchanged pricing table in the help center.

    High
  2. 02.2

    ChatGPT leaves Meridian out of small-agency shortlists

    On "best CRM for small marketing agencies", ChatGPT names four competitors and never mentions Meridian, while citing two competitor comparison pages as sources.

    High
  3. 02.3

    Claude attributes PipelineHub's AI forecasting to Meridian

    On "does Meridian CRM have revenue forecasting", Claude describes a forecasting feature that matches PipelineHub's product page, not Meridian's.

    Medium
  4. 02.4

    Pricing prompts never cite the Meridian pricing page

    All three models answer pricing questions from third-party review sites. The pricing page has no structured data and the plan names differ from the docs.

    Medium
  5. 02.5

    Outdated review score quoted from a 2024 roundup

    Two comparison answers quote a 3.9 rating from an old roundup article. Current review-platform ratings average 4.5.

    Low
03

Recommended actions

The highest-leverage fixes this week, ordered by priority. Each targets a specific issue above and can be verified in next week's run.

  1. 03.1

    Publish a Meridian vs. PipelineHub comparison page

    Models cite competitor comparison pages on the two shortlist prompts Meridian loses. A factual, well-structured comparison page gives them a source that includes you.

    High
  2. 03.2

    Align plan names and prices across site, docs, and help center

    The retired Essentials plan still appears in the help center and in cached docs pages. Consistent plan naming plus updated schema removes the source behind the Gemini pricing error.

    High
  3. 03.3

    Rewrite the forecasting feature page with concrete capability claims

    Claude confuses Meridian's forecasting with a competitor's. A page that states what the feature does and does not do gives models a clean fact to quote.

    Medium
04

Most-cited sources

The domains models actually quoted when answering this week's prompts. This is where AI answers get their facts about your category.

  1. 04.1

    g2reviews.example

    g2reviews.example/categories/crm, cited in 9 prompts. Review platform category pages dominate shortlist answers.

    Review
  2. 04.2

    forumthreads.example

    forumthreads.example/r/sales-tools, cited in 6 prompts. Community threads drive answers on reliability and support quality.

    Forum
  3. 04.3

    pipelinehub.example

    pipelinehub.example/compare/meridian, cited in 5 prompts. A competitor's comparison page is a primary source about your own product.

    Competitor
05

Citation opportunities

Where a content or outreach move would put your domain into the sources models quote.

  1. 05.1

    Refresh the review-platform profile models keep quoting

    The CRM category page cited in 9 prompts shows an outdated feature list for Meridian. Updating the vendor profile changes the most-quoted source in the set.

    Medium
  2. 05.2

    Add an FAQ with pricing schema to the pricing page

    Pricing prompts cite third parties because the pricing page offers no quotable structure. FAQ markup with per-plan pricing gives models a first-party source.

    Medium
06

Answer movement

How model answers changed against the previous run, high-impact shifts first.

  1. 06.1

    ChatGPT now lists PipelineHub first on the consultancy shortlist

    Impact: high. Meridian dropped from first to third mention on "best CRM for consultancies".

    High
  2. 06.2

    Gemini added a sources panel to the pricing answer

    Impact: high. The new sources cite two third-party sites, neither of which is meridian-crm.example.

    High
  3. 06.3

    Claude's sentiment on support quality improved

    Impact: medium. The answer now references faster response times, matching last month's support page update.

    Medium
  4. 06.4

    ChatGPT reworded the integrations answer

    Impact: medium. The integration count is now correct, but the answer still omits the two newest connectors.

    Medium
  5. 06.5

    Gemini shortened the onboarding answer

    Impact: low. Meridian's mention and position are unchanged.

    Low
Methodology and scope

CitationWorks asked the same 41 buyer questions to ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini every day from June 22 to June 29, 2026, 123 answers per day. Each answer was scored for brand mentions and position, competitor mentions, cited sources, sentiment, and factual accuracy against the brand's own site. KPIs compare against the strictly prior 7-day window.

Illustrative example. Meridian CRM, its competitors, and every number in this document are fictional and shown for layout only.

citationworks.com · Weekly report · Jun 29, 2026CitationWorks · AI Visibility Monitoring

How to read this report

This page is the actual report format CitationWorks compiles for every project, weekly by cron and on demand from the dashboard. Nothing here is a mockup of a different, prettier document: the executive summary keys, the item types, and the section order match what the product stores for each report.

  • Executive summary: the eleven KPIs the dashboard tracks, compared to the prior week.
  • Priority issues: open problems ordered by severity, each traceable to a prompt, a model, and an answer.
  • Recommended actions: the fixes most likely to move next week's numbers.
  • Most-cited sources and citation opportunities: where AI answers get their facts, and how to become one of those sources.
  • Answer movement: what changed since the last run, so you catch drift before customers do.

What you receive each week

Paid workspaces get this report compiled automatically every Sunday, an email digest, and the live dashboard behind it: prompt-level answer history, competitor tables on the same question set, and alerts when a model changes its story about you.

Want this for your brand? Start with the free visibility check or read the guide to measuring AI search visibility.

Talk to us

Ask us anything about your AI visibility, or get a guided walkthrough for your team.

  • 01Current AI brand visibility
  • 02Accuracy and risk gaps
  • 03Guidance from a dedicated expert

Typically respond within 24 hours. No automated follow-ups.

By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy